Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the model training #46

Open
kevinLee1990 opened this issue Feb 15, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Question about the model training #46

kevinLee1990 opened this issue Feb 15, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@kevinLee1990
Copy link

kevinLee1990 commented Feb 15, 2022

Hi thank you for your excellent work. I meet a problem when re-run your experiments.

When I re-train the Instance segmentation model with R-50 on COCO dataset, the results are:
43.5, 23.0, 47.0, 65.1
43.2, 22.7, 46.4, 64.8
which are a bit lower with your reported number:
43.7, 23.4, 47.2, 64.8

I use the standard configuration file to run the experiments without any modification, and run on 4/8 V-100 cards. I do not know whether it's just a common scenario, or did you meet the same problem during training?

@bowenc0221
Copy link
Contributor

I have not systematically evaluated the variance on the COCO dataset, but the gap (+/- 0.2 AP) seems reasonable.

@kevinLee1990
Copy link
Author

kevinLee1990 commented Feb 18, 2022

@bowenc0221 Thx for your replying. I re-train your model again in my side, and it achieves 43.3% AP, which is still lower than the reported number (0.4% lower). More specifically, for AP_s, the variance is even larger in my side (-0.4, -0.7, -0.6). Do u have any idea or suggestion to address this issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants