You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi thank you for your excellent work. I meet a problem when re-run your experiments.
When I re-train the Instance segmentation model with R-50 on COCO dataset, the results are:
43.5, 23.0, 47.0, 65.1
43.2, 22.7, 46.4, 64.8
which are a bit lower with your reported number:
43.7, 23.4, 47.2, 64.8
I use the standard configuration file to run the experiments without any modification, and run on 4/8 V-100 cards. I do not know whether it's just a common scenario, or did you meet the same problem during training?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@bowenc0221 Thx for your replying. I re-train your model again in my side, and it achieves 43.3% AP, which is still lower than the reported number (0.4% lower). More specifically, for AP_s, the variance is even larger in my side (-0.4, -0.7, -0.6). Do u have any idea or suggestion to address this issue?
Hi thank you for your excellent work. I meet a problem when re-run your experiments.
When I re-train the Instance segmentation model with R-50 on COCO dataset, the results are:
43.5, 23.0, 47.0, 65.1
43.2, 22.7, 46.4, 64.8
which are a bit lower with your reported number:
43.7, 23.4, 47.2, 64.8
I use the standard configuration file to run the experiments without any modification, and run on 4/8 V-100 cards. I do not know whether it's just a common scenario, or did you meet the same problem during training?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: