We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
如题,蟹蟹~~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank feedback. We will check it later:-)
Sorry, something went wrong.
从 runtime 机制上,可以有函数的版本,但写法会复杂一点。
从 type 层面,一旦涉及递归,目前的 TS,函数版本的 type infer 不奏效,TS 要求明确标注返回值。
class 版本,TS 有特殊处理,class 定义时,既包含 impl 实现,又包含 type 声明,可以支持递归关联。
函数版本,如果要保持 immutable,也很难实现递归引用。
总的来说,函数式的方式实现 farrow-module 可能是一个全新的思路和考量。现阶段还没有很清晰的想法。
了解了,感谢回复~
No branches or pull requests
如题,蟹蟹~~
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: