Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confluent platform incompatibility #1222

Closed
fedefernandez opened this issue Jun 19, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Confluent platform incompatibility #1222

fedefernandez opened this issue Jun 19, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@fedefernandez
Copy link

Hi!

I'm having some binary incompatibilities with the release of the latest modules.

  • fs2-kafka depends on kafka-clients 3.4.0
  • fs2-kafka-vulcan depends on kafka-avro-serializer 7.3.3

Given the Supported Versions and Interoperability for Confluent Platform, should fs2-kafka-vulcan dependency being upgraded to version 7.4.0?

Confluent Platform Apache Kafka® Release Date Standard End of Support Platinum End of Support
7.4.x 3.4.x May 3, 2023 May 3, 2025 May 3, 2026
7.3.x 3.3.x November 4, 2022 November 4, 2024 November 4, 2025

Thanks!

@OneCricketeer
Copy link

What types of errors are you getting? The Avro serializer hasn't had a breaking change in the client library, to my knowledge

@fedefernandez
Copy link
Author

@OneCricketeer oh, it was some time ago, but it was a class not found error if I recall correctly. Sorry for not saving the output, but after seeing the compatibility table I thought it will be a good practice to stick to that.

@OneCricketeer
Copy link

OneCricketeer commented Jul 25, 2023

Confluent's documentation is more about support / version mapping, rather than "binary compatibility" of those versions. Until stated otherwise, Kafka and Schema Registry clients clients have largely been forwards/backwards since at least Kafka 0.10.2 and Confluent Platform 5.x, I think, whenever Protobuf/JSONSchema were introduced into the Registry server API

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants