-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The forced use of the option markup-rows
makes it impossible to search for the symbol '<'
#103
Comments
So, to summarize the issue: I would like to change the text description of arrow characters to
because it is easier to remember and faster than searching for "leftwards arrow". Currently, because rofi tries to show text as markup, it ignores the characters Cheers, |
I haven't forgotten this issue, it's just that I see no real solution (so far). I like the styled descriptions to reduce the clutter of the keywords a bit. However, there seems to be no way to have both that and having Maybe some trickery to do away with |
I think I finally found a solution for you, @chmduquesne: Can you please try to escape the angle brackets with |
It works! Fantastic 😊 |
Hi,
I use rofimoji with custom files, because I like to customize the "shortcuts". For example, instead of using superscripts_and_subscripts.csv, I am using my own version, where
becomes
The reason for this is that I find it orders of magnitude more intuitive to look for
_1
thanSubscript One
. For similar reasons, I also defined shortcuts to mathematical symbols to their latex equivalent.I would love to use a similar approach to look for symbols like ← or →, and type text like
<-
or->
to look for arrows. However, because the optionmarkup-rows
is used, rofi does not let me look for the symbol<
.I would like to suggest to make the use of this option optional, in order to make the search more user friendly. I personally don't care too much for the
<small></small>
style which often accompanies the description, so I would edit my files to remove this styling, because it makes searching much easier.Cheers,
Christophe-Marie
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: