Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Kubernetes Deployment Options to the Bytewax Materialization Engine #3517

Closed
adamschmidt opened this issue Mar 3, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3518
Closed

Add Kubernetes Deployment Options to the Bytewax Materialization Engine #3517

adamschmidt opened this issue Mar 3, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3518
Labels
kind/feature New feature or request

Comments

@adamschmidt
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The Bytewax materialization engine needs to support configuration options for more advanced Kubernetes deployments (EKS, GCP, etc) to make it usable at scale.

Describe the solution you'd like
The main configuration options that are needed for the Bytewax materialization job are:

  • setting explicit resource requests and limits (rather than relying on platform defaults which may not be enough)
  • supporting service accounts and IAM roles
  • specifying an image pull secret to support pulling Docker images from Dockerhub, Artifactory, etc

Describe alternatives you've considered
The Kubernetes job that runs is dynamically generated by the bytewax code. Existing configuration options are insufficient.

Additional context
I'd really like to test the Bytewax materialization engine on our instance of EKS. In its current implementation, it's operationally too simple and not usable outside of minikube.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant