Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feast Roadmap #420

Closed
woop opened this issue Jan 8, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Feast Roadmap #420

woop opened this issue Jan 8, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@woop
Copy link
Member

woop commented Jan 8, 2020

Creating this issue based on our conversations from the community call. We need to draft a roadmap for Feast for the next 6 months.

@woop woop self-assigned this Jan 26, 2020
@woop woop added kind/discussion priority/p0 Highest priority labels Jan 26, 2020
@woop
Copy link
Member Author

woop commented Feb 6, 2020

Current roadmap for Feast 0.5 and Feast 0.6 has been documented here.

@woop woop closed this as completed Feb 10, 2020
@ches
Copy link
Member

ches commented Feb 14, 2020

Should we have a more evergreen way to refer to this? The Google Doc isn't version-specific so that's fine as-is, but perhaps we can link to it from primary documentation so people can easily be aware of it.

Perhaps we could try to maintain milestones in GitHub? I see their are some project boards set up for release versions already, it's surprising that GitHub doesn't seem to have obvious ways yet to integrate projects and milestones with automation.

@ches
Copy link
Member

ches commented Feb 14, 2020

Should we have a more evergreen way to refer to this? The Google Doc isn't version-specific so that's fine as-is, but perhaps we can link to it from primary documentation so people can easily be aware of it.

Sorry, I just noticed that it is linked on the README, but not on feast.dev GitBook I don't believe. Maybe it could be referenced on the Contributing page, unless there's a better more apparent place.

(Somewhat of a tangent, but to your point on #445, the Contributing guide is pretty overloaded with also being a quick start currently—it seems to me like a good step to split those two purposes, I may take a stab and see what you all think).

@woop
Copy link
Member Author

woop commented Feb 14, 2020

Should we have a more evergreen way to refer to this? The Google Doc isn't version-specific so that's fine as-is, but perhaps we can link to it from primary documentation so people can easily be aware of it.

Sorry, I just noticed that it is linked on the README, but not on feast.dev GitBook I don't believe. Maybe it could be referenced on the Contributing page, unless there's a better more apparent place.

(Somewhat of a tangent, but to your point on #445, the Contributing guide is pretty overloaded with also being a quick start currently—it seems to me like a good step to split those two purposes, I may take a stab and see what you all think).

I get the same feeling. I think a development guide would be better. Let me first submit what I have and we can take it from there.

@woop
Copy link
Member Author

woop commented Feb 14, 2020

Should we have a more evergreen way to refer to this? The Google Doc isn't version-specific so that's fine as-is, but perhaps we can link to it from primary documentation so people can easily be aware of it.

I will also add it to feast.dev. Are you suggesting we move it to the repository itself maybe? A lot of projects just use markdown.

Perhaps we could try to maintain milestones in GitHub? I see their are some project boards set up for release versions already, it's surprising that GitHub doesn't seem to have obvious ways yet to integrate projects and milestones with automation.

To be honest, the GitHub projects API sucks. I havent found a way to scrape/automate it. Internally we are using Jira and its quite a pain to maintain both.

How would you want to split up work between milestones and projects? Do you want to map releases to milestones?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants