You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With the introduction of FairGBM now we have LightGBM and FairGBM support in Pulse:
However, in the UI they show up as completely different things, which doesn't give the best UX:
Microsoft LightGBM - LightGBM Binary Classifier
Feedzai GBM - FairGBM (LightGBM with fairness constraints)
We could also use the name Feedzai GBM for the LightGBM provider, and at most rename its algorithm to Microsoft LightGBM Binary Classifier, turning into something more organized:
Feedzai GBM - Microsoft LightGBM Binary Classifier
Feedzai GBM - FairGBM (LightGBM with fairness constraints)
I also have doubts if FairGBM should also be renamed Binary Classifier, for now it only allows that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With the introduction of FairGBM now we have LightGBM and FairGBM support in Pulse:
However, in the UI they show up as completely different things, which doesn't give the best UX:
Microsoft LightGBM - LightGBM Binary Classifier
Feedzai GBM - FairGBM (LightGBM with fairness constraints)
We could also use the name
Feedzai GBM
for the LightGBM provider, and at most rename its algorithm toMicrosoft LightGBM Binary Classifier
, turning into something more organized:Feedzai GBM - Microsoft LightGBM Binary Classifier
Feedzai GBM - FairGBM (LightGBM with fairness constraints)
I also have doubts if FairGBM should also be renamed Binary Classifier, for now it only allows that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: