Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

esites Topic 29: When and how should you use a LocationId? [DECISION] #29

Closed
rondlg opened this issue Nov 5, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed
Labels
DECISION A decision has been made and all changes made. esites This issue relates or refers to the sites module

Comments

@rondlg
Copy link
Member

rondlg commented Nov 5, 2021

DISCUSSION POINTS:

There are many duplicate localities in sites and also many with no lat.lon. There are an increasing number of internal and external initiatives to georeference specimens and departments to take advantage of them. In order to do so, especially if data is extracted and sent away we need to include a reference field to make sure that the information can correctly be repatriated and also de-duplicated wherever possible. What is the best way to do this? irns/UUIDs?

@rondlg
Copy link
Member Author

rondlg commented Nov 5, 2021

DECISION(S):

We will assign a UUID to each site record and this, not the irn will become the locationID (sensu Darwin Core) for that record NOT for the site as a unique place on a map i.e. two or more locationIDs may refer to the exact same place. The UUID will always be set = No. If a georeferencing service returns a persistent identifier for a locality (eg from Getty) that can then be placed in the GUID grid with preferred = Yes. Records with matching GUIDs of the nature can then be merged. Audit will keep track of these replacements. See LocationID workflow and DwC structural changes.

See Location Record Identifiers Workflow

@rondlg
Copy link
Member Author

rondlg commented Nov 5, 2021

DATA CHANGES: Data Changes Doc

Pre new development: None
Post development:

@rondlg rondlg added DECISION A decision has been made and all changes made. esites This issue relates or refers to the sites module labels Nov 5, 2021
@rondlg rondlg closed this as completed May 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DECISION A decision has been made and all changes made. esites This issue relates or refers to the sites module
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant