We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only makes sense after renaming in #344
The rule currently ignores the LHS of destructuring assignments. But these could also be checked:
var v: any; ({v, ...{v}} = get<Record<string, any>>());
This just needs an appropriate error message.
OTOH {v, ...{v}} could be simplified to {v, v} by #325
{v, ...{v}}
{v, v}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
conclusion: this is not the responsibility of this rule -> implement in no-useless-destructuring in #325
no-useless-destructuring
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Only makes sense after renaming in #344
The rule currently ignores the LHS of destructuring assignments. But these could also be checked:
This just needs an appropriate error message.
OTOH
{v, ...{v}}
could be simplified to{v, v}
by #325The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: