You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently have pages for each SSH implementation. We might want to also provide pages for each protocol (such as "aes128-ctr"), or protocol family (such as "aes*-ctr", i.e. "aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr").
On these pages, we could
list clients supporting the protocol
link to the relevants RFCs / specs
whether it is required / recommended / optional / not listed in the RFC
add some notes, e.g. with pointers to known weaknesses, whether the protocol is known to be unsafe, etc.
We currently have pages for each SSH implementation. We might want to also provide pages for each protocol (such as "aes128-ctr"), or protocol family (such as "aes*-ctr", i.e. "aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr").
On these pages, we could
Some starting places:
"[...] uses an identical packet format to the
AES-GCM mode specified in RFC 5647, but uses simpler and different
selection rules during key exchange."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: