-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 203
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VBScript flavor #723
Comments
For Code Generator, or as another regex flavor? |
Another regex flavour. Which unfortunately is not well documented . |
Basic syntax is pretty normal: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/1400241x(v=vs.84).aspx I think using JavaScript flavor is a pretty safe bet for coding regex against (J|VB)Script. You can compare the JavaScript syntax to MSDN. At a very quick glance I didn't find diff. |
Pretty much? Or completely? |
Pretty much. I think that is as good as it gets unless you reach out to MS for a language spec. http://regular-expressions.mobi/vbscript.html has the same info. Btw, as far as I know regex101 supports all types of replacement syntax at once, regardless of selected flavor, so when doing replacement you may get different behavior than generated code. e.g. #711 |
So what's missing?
Wow. Thanks for the warning. |
Does anyone actually still use VBscript 😄 ? |
Unfortunately some have to... until they can afford the time to port out of that muddle. |
You can use it to script Windows/Microsoft Office objects. For example open an Word file and save it as PDF, or modify registry entries during an installation/setup process. Essentially automation for Windows or macro-like programs that work on any/multiple Office documents. simultaneously. The alternative to these is to write C++ or .NET code with all the weird linking, compiling and IDEs that you need; for those cases it's much easier to fire up Notepad and write code that can be run on any Windows system without installing extra programs. |
Windows 95 excepted :) |
Heh, so you're saying it works on Windows 3.11 and 1.0? |
No... :)
None that have confessed :) |
I don't think this is worth it. Reopen if you feel otherwise. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: