Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can you give a good weight #47

Open
yuqilol opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Can you give a good weight #47

yuqilol opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@yuqilol
Copy link

yuqilol commented Aug 3, 2023

hey,i wanna you great pth like e100_valacc0.98349.pth,please help me。

@rishabh063
Copy link

its present in the output folder named output/e118_valacc0.79805.pth

@dhillyon
Copy link

Hi! Did you have any luck with this? I can't seem to get accuracy above 79.5% in training.

@fire717
Copy link
Owner

fire717 commented Mar 28, 2024

Thank you for your interest in this repo. I apologize that I am unable to provide the model at this time as it was trained on the intranet during my previous job at the company. And that is based on our business data, with more accurate labeling and a relatively simple validation set, so the score is relatively high.
I don't know what your specific scenario is. If it's optimization for academic paper growth points, then movenet is not a good baseline because it has not published any papers or has no official open source implementation.
If it is for your own project, it is recommended that you supplement more training data. At the same time, if it is not limited to using movenet, it is now recommended that you try the newly released RTMPose.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants