You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the Bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
If a court user runs a pending report for a specific Judge, then selects the generic Judge option on the pending report, followed by clicking the load more button, the user will experience a 400 error.
Potential solution???? Remove the load more button if no Judge is selected?
Business Impact/Reason for Severity
low
In which environment did you see this bug?
Test, Prod
Who were you logged in as?
Any Court user
What were you doing when you discovered this bug? (Using the application, demoing, smoke tests, testing other functionality, etc.)
Testing other functionality
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Log in as any Court user
Click on reports, and select Pending report (notice that there is NOT a "Load more" option on this screen)
Select a Judge that has a lot of pending items from the dropdown menu (enough for the load more button to show up for this judge)
Next, select "-Judge-" from the dropdown menu
Notice that there is now nothing displayed for pending items, but there is a load more button
Click on the load more button
Receive 400 error.
Expected Behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
The load more button probably shouldn't be there?
Actual Behavior
A clear and concise description of what actually happened.
The load more button displays, and if the user clicks on it, they receive a 400 error
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
This is what it looks like when you first access the pending report - there isn't a "load more" button available:
After selecting a Judge that has a lot of pending items and WILL have the load more button present, go back and select the generic judge again from the dropdown. Notice that the load more button is present now.
If you click on the load more button, you get a 400 error:
Desktop (please complete the following information):
OS: [e.g. iOS]
Browser [e.g. chrome, safari]
Version [e.g. 22]
Smartphone (please complete the following information):
Device: [e.g. iPhone6]
OS: [e.g. iOS8.1]
Browser [e.g. stock browser, safari]
Version [e.g. 22]
Cause of Bug, If Known
Process for Logging a Bug:
Complete the above information
Add a severity tag (Critical, High Severity, Medium Severity or Low Severity). See below for priority definition.
Severity Definition:
Critical Defect
Blocks entire system's or module’s functionality
No workarounds available
Testing cannot proceed further without bug being fixed.
High-severity Defect
Affects key functionality of an application
There's a workaround, but not obvious or easy
App behaves in a way that is strongly different from the one stated in the requirements
Medium-severity Defect
A minor function does not behave in a way stated in the requirements.
Workaround is available and easy
Low-severity Defect
Mostly related to an application’s UI
Doesn't need a workaround, because it doesn't impact functionality
Definition of Ready for Bugs(Created 10-4-21)
Definition used: A failure or flaw in the system which produces an incorrect or undesired result that deviates from the expected result or behavior. (Note: Expected results are use cases that have been documented in past user stories as acceptance criteria and test cases, and do not include strange behavior unrelated to use cases.)
The following criteria must be met in order for the development team to begin work on the bug.
The bug must:
Be focused on solving a user problem
Contain data for all fields in the bug template, so the team can pick it up and begin working immediately
Process: If the unexpected results are new use cases that have been identified, but not yet built, new acceptance criteria and test cases should be captured in a new user story and prioritized by the product owner.
If the Court is not able to reproduce the bug, add the “Unable to reproduce” tag. This will provide visibility into the type of support that may be needed by the Court. In the event that the Court cannot reproduce the bug, the Court will work with Flexion to communicate what type of troubleshooting help may be needed.
Definition of Done (Updated 4-14-21)
Product Owner
Bug fix has been validated in the Court's test environment
Engineering
Automated test scripts have been written
Field level and page level validation errors (front-end and server-side) integrated and functioning
Verify that language for docket record for internal users and external users is identical
Describe the Bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
If a court user runs a pending report for a specific Judge, then selects the generic Judge option on the pending report, followed by clicking the load more button, the user will experience a 400 error.
Potential solution???? Remove the load more button if no Judge is selected?
Business Impact/Reason for Severity
low
In which environment did you see this bug?
Test, Prod
Who were you logged in as?
Any Court user
What were you doing when you discovered this bug? (Using the application, demoing, smoke tests, testing other functionality, etc.)
Testing other functionality
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected Behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
The load more button probably shouldn't be there?
Actual Behavior
A clear and concise description of what actually happened.
The load more button displays, and if the user clicks on it, they receive a 400 error
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
This is what it looks like when you first access the pending report - there isn't a "load more" button available:
After selecting a Judge that has a lot of pending items and WILL have the load more button present, go back and select the generic judge again from the dropdown. Notice that the load more button is present now.
If you click on the load more button, you get a 400 error:
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Smartphone (please complete the following information):
Cause of Bug, If Known
Process for Logging a Bug:
Severity Definition:
Critical Defect
Blocks entire system's or module’s functionality
No workarounds available
Testing cannot proceed further without bug being fixed.
High-severity Defect
Affects key functionality of an application
There's a workaround, but not obvious or easy
App behaves in a way that is strongly different from the one stated in the requirements
Medium-severity Defect
A minor function does not behave in a way stated in the requirements.
Workaround is available and easy
Low-severity Defect
Mostly related to an application’s UI
Doesn't need a workaround, because it doesn't impact functionality
Definition of Ready for Bugs(Created 10-4-21)
Definition used: A failure or flaw in the system which produces an incorrect or undesired result that deviates from the expected result or behavior. (Note: Expected results are use cases that have been documented in past user stories as acceptance criteria and test cases, and do not include strange behavior unrelated to use cases.)
The following criteria must be met in order for the development team to begin work on the bug.
The bug must:
Process: If the unexpected results are new use cases that have been identified, but not yet built, new acceptance criteria and test cases should be captured in a new user story and prioritized by the product owner.
If the Court is not able to reproduce the bug, add the “Unable to reproduce” tag. This will provide visibility into the type of support that may be needed by the Court. In the event that the Court cannot reproduce the bug, the Court will work with Flexion to communicate what type of troubleshooting help may be needed.
Definition of Done (Updated 4-14-21)
Product Owner
Engineering
test
environment if prod-like data is required. Otherwise, deployed to anyexperimental
environment for review.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: