Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: Clicking the load more on the pending report for the "generic" Judge option causes 400 error #10366

Closed
11 tasks
ttlenard opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ttlenard
Copy link
Collaborator

Describe the Bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
If a court user runs a pending report for a specific Judge, then selects the generic Judge option on the pending report, followed by clicking the load more button, the user will experience a 400 error.

Potential solution???? Remove the load more button if no Judge is selected?

Business Impact/Reason for Severity
low

In which environment did you see this bug?
Test, Prod

Who were you logged in as?
Any Court user

What were you doing when you discovered this bug? (Using the application, demoing, smoke tests, testing other functionality, etc.)
Testing other functionality

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Log in as any Court user
  2. Click on reports, and select Pending report (notice that there is NOT a "Load more" option on this screen)
  3. Select a Judge that has a lot of pending items from the dropdown menu (enough for the load more button to show up for this judge)
  4. Next, select "-Judge-" from the dropdown menu
  5. Notice that there is now nothing displayed for pending items, but there is a load more button
  6. Click on the load more button
  7. Receive 400 error.

Expected Behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
The load more button probably shouldn't be there?

Actual Behavior
A clear and concise description of what actually happened.
The load more button displays, and if the user clicks on it, they receive a 400 error

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
This is what it looks like when you first access the pending report - there isn't a "load more" button available:
image.png

After selecting a Judge that has a lot of pending items and WILL have the load more button present, go back and select the generic judge again from the dropdown. Notice that the load more button is present now.
image.png

If you click on the load more button, you get a 400 error:
image.png

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. iOS]
  • Browser [e.g. chrome, safari]
  • Version [e.g. 22]

Smartphone (please complete the following information):

  • Device: [e.g. iPhone6]
  • OS: [e.g. iOS8.1]
  • Browser [e.g. stock browser, safari]
  • Version [e.g. 22]

Cause of Bug, If Known

Process for Logging a Bug:

  • Complete the above information
  • Add a severity tag (Critical, High Severity, Medium Severity or Low Severity). See below for priority definition.

Severity Definition:

  • Critical Defect
    Blocks entire system's or module’s functionality
    No workarounds available
    Testing cannot proceed further without bug being fixed.

  • High-severity Defect
    Affects key functionality of an application
    There's a workaround, but not obvious or easy
    App behaves in a way that is strongly different from the one stated in the requirements

  • Medium-severity Defect
    A minor function does not behave in a way stated in the requirements.
    Workaround is available and easy

  • Low-severity Defect
    Mostly related to an application’s UI
    Doesn't need a workaround, because it doesn't impact functionality

Definition of Ready for Bugs(Created 10-4-21)

Definition used: A failure or flaw in the system which produces an incorrect or undesired result that deviates from the expected result or behavior. (Note: Expected results are use cases that have been documented in past user stories as acceptance criteria and test cases, and do not include strange behavior unrelated to use cases.)

The following criteria must be met in order for the development team to begin work on the bug.

The bug must:

  • Be focused on solving a user problem
  • Contain data for all fields in the bug template, so the team can pick it up and begin working immediately

Process: If the unexpected results are new use cases that have been identified, but not yet built, new acceptance criteria and test cases should be captured in a new user story and prioritized by the product owner.

If the Court is not able to reproduce the bug, add the “Unable to reproduce” tag. This will provide visibility into the type of support that may be needed by the Court. In the event that the Court cannot reproduce the bug, the Court will work with Flexion to communicate what type of troubleshooting help may be needed.

Definition of Done (Updated 4-14-21)

Product Owner

  • Bug fix has been validated in the Court's test environment

Engineering

  • Automated test scripts have been written
  • Field level and page level validation errors (front-end and server-side) integrated and functioning
  • Verify that language for docket record for internal users and external users is identical
  • New screens have been added to pa11y scripts
  • All new functionality verified to work with keyboard and macOS voiceover https://www.apple.com/voiceover/info/guide/_1124.html
  • READMEs, other appropriate docs and swagger/APIs fully updated
  • UI should be touch optimized and responsive for external only (functions on supported mobile devices and optimized for screen sizes as required)
  • Interactors should validate entities before calling persistence methods
  • Code refactored for clarity and to remove any known technical debt
  • Deployed to the Court's test environment if prod-like data is required. Otherwise, deployed to any experimental environment for review.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Closed
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants