meta(coverage): tracking issue for coverage improvements

[mds1]

Features:

• Coverage: Unhandled AST nodes #1968
• feat(forge): disable coverage for assertions #4294
• coverage: require should be a branch #8423
• Forge coverage doesn't recognize require with custom error branches #8279

Bugs:

• forge coverage produces incorrect output #7784
• bug(forge): incorrect branch coverage when passing array elements to custom errors #4309
• bug(forge): accessing array elements breaks coverage for if statements #4310
• bug(forge): no-effect statements on the stack are not ignored in the coverage report #4311 / bug: coverage report misses return-declared variables if returned as-is #7476
• bug(forge): empty if/else statements are not covered #4314
• bug(forge): coverage does not work for enum assignments #4315
• bug(forge): coverage does not work when the test contract inherits the target contract #4316

Relevant conversations:

• dapptools-style coverage #99 (comment)

[KholdStare]

I think this is a duplicate of #1961

[mds1]

That one is pretty old, this one will be updated to replace it based on new coverage issues/changes

[KholdStare]

@mds1 This comment in the old issue has none of the issues addressed: #1961 (comment) .

[yorhodes]

any updates here? how can I help?

[zerosnacks]

Closing in favor of #1961 + #1961 (comment)

[zerosnacks]

Reopened, updating description instead