-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dataset HU range #27
Comments
Hi @kirmans, thanks for your interest in our study. You are right, the Ma et al. dataset consists of coronacases and radiopedia data. As you already mentioned, we performed at first a clipping approach on the all samples to -1250 to 250. Ideally, only the coronacases should be clipped (which we clipped on the result data for our publication), but we noticed that high value intensity (250-255) regions on the radiopedia volumes are not performance related, which is why we published this simplistic approach on just clipping all samples (coronacases and radiopedia) on -1250 to 250. This cut only the top 5 intensity values on the grayscale normalized radiopedia data, but performed a reasonable clipping on the coronacases. Paper extract:
Therefore, long story short: We performed only clipping on coronacases and none on radiopedia, sadly. Here is also a small output of our data exploration, which can be reproduced by running scripts/data_exploration.py:
If you have more questions, feel free to ask. Cheers, |
Hi @frankkramer
When I check the dataset, There are 2 part coranacases and radiopedia. For the radiopedia part the images set up 0-255. But for the coronacases part HU range -1250 to 250. I wonder how do you overcome this problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: