Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Opinion Types across Courts #1107

Open
flooie opened this issue Aug 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Opinion Types across Courts #1107

flooie opened this issue Aug 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@flooie
Copy link
Contributor

flooie commented Aug 5, 2024

Currently we have these opinion types in CL - but when we upgrade Juriscraper we may need to create more opinion types.

class Opinion(AbstractDateTimeModel):
    COMBINED = "010combined"
    UNANIMOUS = "015unamimous"
    LEAD = "020lead"
    PLURALITY = "025plurality"
    CONCURRENCE = "030concurrence"
    CONCUR_IN_PART = "035concurrenceinpart"
    DISSENT = "040dissent"
    ADDENDUM = "050addendum"
    REMITTUR = "060remittitur"
    REHEARING = "070rehearing"
    ON_THE_MERITS = "080onthemerits"
    ON_MOTION_TO_STRIKE = "090onmotiontostrike"
    TRIAL_COURT = "100trialcourt"

@grossir and I are using this issue - and others are welcome to add opinion types that should be included.

For example, let's start with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that slices its opinions up in some unique ways.

it includes Statements that are like opinions but not opinions ...

  • Concurring and Dissenting Statement
  • Concurring Statement
  • Dissenting Statement
  • Affirmance, Evenly Divided Court
  • Dismissal, Evenly Divided Court
  • Evenly Divided Court, Reversal
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant