We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently we have these opinion types in CL - but when we upgrade Juriscraper we may need to create more opinion types.
class Opinion(AbstractDateTimeModel): COMBINED = "010combined" UNANIMOUS = "015unamimous" LEAD = "020lead" PLURALITY = "025plurality" CONCURRENCE = "030concurrence" CONCUR_IN_PART = "035concurrenceinpart" DISSENT = "040dissent" ADDENDUM = "050addendum" REMITTUR = "060remittitur" REHEARING = "070rehearing" ON_THE_MERITS = "080onthemerits" ON_MOTION_TO_STRIKE = "090onmotiontostrike" TRIAL_COURT = "100trialcourt"
@grossir and I are using this issue - and others are welcome to add opinion types that should be included.
For example, let's start with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that slices its opinions up in some unique ways.
it includes Statements that are like opinions but not opinions ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Currently we have these opinion types in CL - but when we upgrade Juriscraper we may need to create more opinion types.
@grossir and I are using this issue - and others are welcome to add opinion types that should be included.
For example, let's start with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that slices its opinions up in some unique ways.
it includes Statements that are like opinions but not opinions ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: