You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When running Sniffles2, I noticed that BND structural variant calls are being reported with 0-based coordinates instead of the expected 1-based VCF standard. For example: chr21 24015867 Sniffles2.BND.4M26D N N[chrM:0[ 60 PASS PRECISE;SVTYPE=BND;...
In this example, chrM:0 suggests a 0-based position. This issue causes downstream compatibility problems with tools that strictly enforce 1-based VCF conventions.
Thank you for looking into this issue :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When running Sniffles2, I noticed that BND structural variant calls are being reported with 0-based coordinates instead of the expected 1-based VCF standard. For example:
chr21 24015867 Sniffles2.BND.4M26D N N[chrM:0[ 60 PASS PRECISE;SVTYPE=BND;...
In this example,
chrM:0
suggests a 0-based position. This issue causes downstream compatibility problems with tools that strictly enforce 1-based VCF conventions.Thank you for looking into this issue :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: