Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inclusion in proptest? #1

Closed
Andlon opened this issue Jan 4, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Inclusion in proptest? #1

Andlon opened this issue Jan 4, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@Andlon
Copy link

Andlon commented Jan 4, 2021

Hi, I just came across this library, and, at least judging from the README, it looks amazing. Have you considered proposing to include this functionality in proptest proper? Assuming the maintainers of proptest would want this, it would make these macros more accessible to users, and it would prevent possible version incompatibilities.

@frozenlib
Copy link
Owner

I have thought about suggesting integration but stopped it because it seemed more interesting to add features without worrying about compatibility.

However, I would be happy if this feature could be used in proptest directly.

@sorairolake
Copy link

sorairolake commented May 27, 2024

It seems that a procedural macro similar to #[proptest] was added in proptest-rs/proptest#316. Note that it is not yet published at this moment.

@Andlon
Copy link
Author

Andlon commented May 27, 2024

Thanks for the heads-up @sorairolake! I'll close this issue.

@Andlon Andlon closed this as completed May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants