-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FsUnit vNext #258
Comments
Agree, but I think that there is no need to support net462 anymore. in my opinion
It is up to you, but I do not see the need for such support. If I am on the old .NET I am should be fine to not update dependencies, NUnit version will be fixed anyway, FsUnit does not have so many bugs and fixes. |
Thank you for your evaluation, I respect that. |
Hello, we would like to update Fantomas to NUnit 4 and we would require a new version of FsUnit with the bump. Please consider releasing an alpha package when you have something. Thanks! |
Hi Florian, I will notify you, when there's an alpha version! |
Thank you! |
@nojaf Hi Florian, |
Works for us! Thanks Constantin! |
FsUnit v6.0 is now available! |
Developments of FsUnit's dependencies are going on and FsUnit needs to adapt sometimes. (nunit/nunit#4568)
As I mentioned here: #256 (comment)
In the meantime of discussing in the NUnit repository I made a little plan to migrate to
NUnit v4
+ maintainingNUnit v3.X
side-by-side.NUnit v3.X
will be maintained for bugfixes etc.I researched some thingies, evaluated those and that's my plan:
FsUnit.NUnit
will be migrated toNUnit v4
, staysFsUnit
on nuget, exported for&net462
net6.0
- New ProjectFsUnit.NUnit3
gets the old code, getsFsUnit.NUnit3
on nuget, exported fornetstandard2.0
&net6.0
(as before)FsUnit.NUnit
andFsUnit.NUnit3
get the same nuget version every updateFurther updates:
Recommended FsUnit vNext is
6.0.0
, release eta mid January 2024Checklist:
FsUnit.NUnit
NUnit v4
migration (FsUnit 6.0.0-alpha1)- New ProjectFsUnit.NUnit3
MsTest 3.x
(FsUnit 6.0.0-alpha2)@sergey-tihon Do you have some suggestions or more points for the checklist?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: