-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can't get optimal performance from Rocket League #186
Comments
Personally it works fine for me with wine-ge from here + linux-zen kernel |
I just updated my system flake to use I disabled the refresh rate limit to see how it performs, while playing a casual game, (I switched the runner on Lutris to |
I have been using the
nix-gaming#rocket-league
for a while on my desktop for a while and I am mostly happy with it, works as expected, the performance is really good and I play without issues. However I have another system, this system is older and has slower hardware equipped (GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
andCPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (12) @ 3.200GHz
). On this system, I have a 144hz monitor and when I launch the rocket-league from nix-gaming it usually does 110+ fps but barely hits 144 in matches and some micro stutters make the gaming experience not so nice.I have been using the
nix-gaming#wine-tkg
as I believe it is the default fornix-gaming#rocket-league
anyways but to troubleshoot I also tried it withnix-gaming#wine-ge
, however, it did not help with my problem. Now the part that confuses me, I also have Lutris installed on the same low-end system (from nixpkgs), and when I run Rocket League from Lutris using theirlutris-GE-Proton8-15-x86_64
I have a way better gaming experience, the game mostly locks to 144Hz and I don't experience micro stutters.I wonder how can I troubleshoot the problem, I am curious if the lutris runner is somehow different from what is shipped within this project, if that is the case is it possible to provide it with nix-gaming as well? If that is not the case are there any suggestions that I could try to match the performance with the Lutris runner?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: