Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test Paramak compatibility with Shift #235

Open
jbae11 opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Test Paramak compatibility with Shift #235

jbae11 opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@jbae11
Copy link

jbae11 commented Apr 6, 2022

After #234 , @jbae11 should test if Paramak-generate h5m files can be directly used with Shift, and that the results match that of OpenMC, for a simple problem.

@shimwell
Copy link
Member

shimwell commented Apr 6, 2022

Might also want to wait for me to finish #236 sorry for slowing this down

@jbae11
Copy link
Author

jbae11 commented Apr 7, 2022

haha nooo take your time you're moving incredibly quickly I'm trying to catch up

@shimwell
Copy link
Member

The develop branch of the paramak now has an improved export_dagmc_h5m method that can add a graveyard and custom tags.

Here is an example of how to use the paramak develop branch to make a shift dagmc file.

https://github.com/shimwell/neutronics_geomentry_comparision_simulation/blob/3bf29f6a604eef07b6e430837682930c2b15b8ca/scripts/1_create_dagmc_geometry.py#L31-L46

Let me know if this works at your end @jbae11

@shimwell
Copy link
Member

I've updated the paramak (PR #240) so that the material tags work a little better with DAGMC (no more accidental vacuum materials).

I've also run the example here and am getting fluxes in all cells.

The mesh resolution will need to be increased to get the flux numbers closer to the CSG values

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants