Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make types stricter and more complete #2

Open
gakonst opened this issue Dec 24, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Make types stricter and more complete #2

gakonst opened this issue Dec 24, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@gakonst
Copy link
Owner

gakonst commented Dec 24, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Currently a lot of types are omitted because they're not important for the usecase or their type is set to String. We should make these more accurate.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@gakonst