Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NTR: sulfite export across plasma membrane #29605

Open
ValWood opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 6 comments
Open

NTR: sulfite export across plasma membrane #29605

ValWood opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 6 comments

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor

ValWood commented Jan 27, 2025

Please provide as much information as you can:

  • Suggested term label:

sulfite export across plasma membrane

  • Definition (free text)
    The directed movement of sulfite from inside of a cell, across the plasma membrane and into the extracellular region.

  • Reference, in format PMID:#######

PMID: 17322211
PMID: 30859719
The most efficient sulfite detoxification mechanism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae uses a plasma membrane protein called Ssu1 to efflux sulfite.

  • Gene product name and ID to be annotated to this term

https://www.pombase.org/gene/SPBPB10D8.04c

  • Parent term(s)

GO:0000316 sulfite transmembrane transport

  • Synonyms (please specify, EXACT, BROAD, NARROW or RELATED)

sulfite efflux

  • Any other information
@ValWood ValWood changed the title NTR: [proposed new term label] NTR: sulfite export across plasma membrane Jan 27, 2025
@raymond91125
Copy link
Contributor

"SSU1 encodes a sulphite efflux pump" @ValWood Would it be better if we make this an MF (sulfite efflux transmembrane transporter activity), PART_OF sulfite detoxification (BP)?

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Feb 5, 2025

I thought the 'rule' for transporters is to encode the directionality of transport in the BP term and not in the MF term.
but I see we do have efflux pumps so this might be OK.

@pgaudet can confirm.

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Feb 5, 2025

we have many terms with "export across the plasma membrane" (and many children)

@raymond91125
Copy link
Contributor

we have many terms with "export across the plasma membrane" (and many children)

Yes. But I thought in the case of SSU1, it's a single step process.

@deustp01
Copy link

deustp01 commented Feb 5, 2025

I thought the 'rule' for transporters is to encode the directionality of transport in the BP term and not in the MF term.

Is there also a need for a distinction between pumps (movement of specific chemical entities in a direction determined by the orientation of the energy-consuming pump in the membrane) and channels (movement of specific chemical entities down a concentration gradient determined by the relative concentrations of the entities on the two sides of the membrane)?

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Feb 6, 2025

  • I don't know if the sulphite efflux family are channels or pumps. This doesn't appear to be annotated. They are Major Facilitator Superfamily so they could be channels or pumps.

  • I wanted to describe the direction, because I wanted to make it clear in my model for sulphur assimilation that sulfite was exported, not imported.

  • I can't remember whether the correct way to model direction is by MF or BP, but historically we have BP for transmembrane transport of substrates, because, in most cases multiple transporters with different affinities contribute to a BP. I'm not sure if this is the best way to model TM transport long term, or whether transporters should be integrated in some way with metabolism. I have a future question about this for the Noctua modelling call (low priority)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants