Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rationalise: Sample-type, sample-material-type #186

Open
geoderekh opened this issue Apr 20, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Rationalise: Sample-type, sample-material-type #186

geoderekh opened this issue Apr 20, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@geoderekh
Copy link
Member

Sample type has lots of detailed top concepts. Sample_material_type has lots detailed narrower concepts and lots of heirarchical relationships.
The sample type vocab handles most surface geology samples but is very limited for wellhead samples. The detail that sits below wellhead samples is all stored in the sample-material vocabs, which seems to have been optimised for petroleum and gas and is lacking for geochemistry concepts.
Concepts in the two vocabs are also apparently conflated with one another and need to be rationalised to improve the functionalty of GeoProps and integrity of our graph.
These issues will need to be resolved for Phase 2 (i.e. within 3-5 months) but are out of scope for MVP.
@KellyVance KellyVance changed the title Sample-type vs sample-material-type rationalisation Rationalise: Sample-type, sample-material-type Apr 29, 2020
@DavidCrosswellGSQ
Copy link
Contributor

Need to align to the IGSN vocabs - this comment here as a placeholder TO DO

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@DavidCrosswellGSQ @geoderekh