Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Value-substitution for fitAll() n-parameter might be misleading #2

Open
georg-un opened this issue Feb 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Value-substitution for fitAll() n-parameter might be misleading #2

georg-un opened this issue Feb 15, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@georg-un
Copy link
Owner

georg-un commented Feb 15, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Currently, the n-parameter of the fitAll() method substitutes the value with a 1 if the value is 0 or less. However, users could input negative values (e.g. -1) if they wanted to retrieve the least fitting distributions. In this case, the substitution could cause confusion.
@georg-un georg-un added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@georg-un