Skip to content

Explore using vitest #6040

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
AbhiPrasad opened this issue Oct 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Explore using vitest #6040

AbhiPrasad opened this issue Oct 25, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@AbhiPrasad
Copy link
Member

AbhiPrasad commented Oct 25, 2022

Problem Statement

https://vitest.dev/

Replay is exploring vitest, we should also investigate if this will bring performance improvements to the monorepo getsentry/sentry-replay#250.

Solution Brainstorm

Things we have to worry about:

cc @billyvg

@billyvg
Copy link
Member

billyvg commented Oct 25, 2022

I would be curious about speed - I didn't see a noticeable change in CI for the replay's repo, but our test suite is pretty small there. It would be nice to test this out in the @sentry/browser or @sentry/tracing packages since they have heftier set of tests and see how it performs. The main perf benefit I see w/ vitest is for local development (i.e. in watch mode) - it felt a lot snappier than jest.

@HazAT
Copy link
Member

HazAT commented Jan 26, 2023

Closing, not sure when/if we are going to do this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants