-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inverse Command #9
Comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
👋 fellow Hubber! Love this action and its versatility.
One idea that came to mind that would be helpful would be to specify an opposite/inverse of a command that would force the
continue
output to be'false'
. Specifically I was thinking about approval workflows that happen in issues instead of PRs. Currently, this would have to be implemented with two differentgithub/command
steps (one for.approve
and one for.deny
).Alternatively, it'd be helpful to combine them into one step:
What do you think?
Edit: I just realized that I probably worded this poorly. I know that further steps that check the
continue
output would not run because commenting with.deny
would not match the expected keyword. What would probably work better would be to have a separate output that is set when the opposite command is provided.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: