Talk about Warning: Skip output 'secret' since it may contain secret.

[jsoref]

Code of Conduct

• I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's Code of Conduct

What article on docs.github.com is affected?

https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/defining-outputs-for-jobs#overview

What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?

docs/data/reusables/actions/jobs/section-defining-outputs-for-jobs.md

Line 5 in 427d2bf

Job outputs containing expressions are evaluated on the runner at the end of each job. Outputs containing secrets are redacted on the runner and not sent to {% data variables.product.prodname_actions %}.

Should:

1. Include the current message from github/runner to improve SEO so that people will find the documentation
2. Link to the advice on what to do:
   https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/workflow-commands-for-github-actions#example-masking-and-passing-a-secret-between-jobs-or-workflows

Additional information

Users complain about this: actions/runner#475 (comment)

[nguyenalex836]

@jsoref Thanks for opening an issue! I'll get this triaged for review ✨

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening an issue! We've triaged this issue for technical review by a subject matter expert 👀

[github-actions]

This is a gentle bump for the docs team that this issue is waiting for technical review.

[nguyenalex836]

@jsoref Thank you for your patience while our SME team reviewed! 💛

Should:

• Include the current message from github/runner to improve SEO so that people will find the documentation
• Link to the advice on what to do: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/workflow-commands-for-github-actions#example-masking-and-passing-a-secret-between-jobs-or-workflows

Our SME team agrees with your guidance. You, or anyone else, is welcome to open a PR to make this update ✨