[daily secrets] Daily Secrets Analysis - February 1, 2026 #13061
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-02-04T09:49:16.163Z. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Date: February 1, 2026
Workflow Files Analyzed: 147
Run: §21560684618
📊 Executive Summary
secrets.*)github.token)🔑 Top 10 Secrets by Usage
View All 24 Secret Types
🛡️ Security Posture
Protection Mechanisms
✅ Universal Redaction: 147/147 workflows (100%) have redaction steps
✅ Token Cascades: 437 instances of fallback chains (
GH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKEN || GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN || GITHUB_TOKEN)✅ Permission Blocks: 147 workflows have explicit permission definitions
✅ No Hardcoded Credentials: 0 potential hardcoded tokens detected
✅ No Secrets in Outputs: 0 instances of secrets exposed in job outputs
Security Checks
Template Injection Analysis
Status:⚠️ Requires Attention
Sample Usage Patterns:
Recommendation: Most workflows use safe metadata fields (repository, issue numbers, etc.) which have low injection risk. However, consider expanding safe-inputs feature adoption for workflows handling user-controlled text (titles, bodies, comments).
📈 Secret Distribution by Workflow Type
Analysis: The majority of secret usage (75%) is distributed across various workflow types. Daily/scheduled workflows account for 18% of usage, likely due to automated monitoring and analysis tasks.
🎯 Key Findings
💡 Recommendations
📖 Reference Documentation
For detailed information about secret usage patterns and security mechanisms:
scratchpad/secrets-yml.mdactions/setup/js/redact_secrets.cjssafe-inputsconfigurationGenerated: 2026-02-01T09:46:01Z
Next Analysis: Daily at 00:00 UTC
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions