Daily Code Metrics Report - 2026-02-01 #13148
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-02-04T17:23:20.439Z. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The gh-aw codebase demonstrates strong testing practices with an exceptional test-to-source ratio of 2.222, indicating that test code outweighs source code by more than 2:1. The repository maintains 503,851 total lines of code across 8 programming languages, with Go dominating at 76.5% (385,265 LOC). The overall quality score stands at 77.6/100, with particular strength in test coverage (30/30 points) and documentation (20/20 points). The codebase has grown by 35.5% over the past 7 days, with 42 files modified across 15 commits, adding 3,250 lines and removing 1,180 lines for a net gain of 2,070 lines.
📊 Visualizations
LOC Distribution by Language
The codebase is predominantly Go (76.5%), followed by Markdown documentation (18.5%). This reflects a well-documented Go project with strong emphasis on both implementation and documentation. The small presence of TypeScript/JavaScript (0.7%) and Python (0.03%) suggests selective use of these languages for specific tooling or integration tasks.
Top Directories by LOC
The
pkg/directory dominates with 403,550 LOC (55.5% of tracked directories), indicating a well-structured Go project following standard package organization. The.github/workflows/directory contains 245,071 LOC (33.7%), reflecting extensive CI/CD automation and workflow definitions. Documentation indocs/comprises 44,823 LOC (6.2%), demonstrating commitment to comprehensive documentation.Quality Score Breakdown
Overall Quality Score: 77.6/100
The quality breakdown reveals:
Test Coverage Analysis
With 879 test files containing 268,283 lines of test code versus 120,700 lines of source code, this project demonstrates industry-leading test coverage. The 2.222 test-to-source ratio significantly exceeds typical recommendations (0.5-1.0), indicating thorough testing practices and strong commitment to code quality and reliability.
Code Churn (Last 7 Days)
Recent development activity has been focused on:
pkg/workflow/compiler.go(net +330)workflows/daily-code-metrics.mdpkg/agent/executor.go(net +225)docs/architecture.md(net +245)The churn pattern indicates active feature development with emphasis on workflow compilation, agent execution, and documentation improvements.
Historical Trends (30 Days)
The 30-day trend shows significant volatility in total LOC, with a dramatic drop around January 21st followed by recent growth. Quality scores have varied between 62-90 points, with recent improvement to 77.6. Test coverage percentages show fluctuation, reflecting the dynamic nature of the codebase as features are added and refactored.
📈 Detailed Metrics
Size Metrics
Lines of Code by Language
Lines of Code by Directory
Quality Indicators
Test Coverage
Code Churn (Last 7 Days)
Most Active Files
Workflow Metrics
Documentation
Quality Score: 77.6/100
Component Breakdown
💡 Insights & Recommendations
Investigate Large File Count: With 190 files exceeding 500 lines of code, consider refactoring opportunities to improve code organization and maintainability. This would boost the Code Organization score from 24% to a healthier range.
Maintain Exceptional Test Coverage: The 2.222 test-to-source ratio is outstanding and significantly exceeds industry standards. Continue this practice as it provides excellent regression protection and code confidence.
Monitor Recent Growth: The 35.5% LOC increase over 7 days indicates rapid development. Ensure this growth is sustainable and that code quality metrics remain stable despite the expansion.
Review Workflow Metrics Discrepancy: The workflow metrics show 179 total workflow files but 0 compiled workflows and 0 average size, which appears inconsistent with the 245,071 LOC in
.github/workflows/. Investigate metric collection accuracy.Enhance Comment Density: At 10.39% comment ratio (6.9/10 score), there's room for improvement. Target 15% comment ratio for optimal code comprehension, particularly in complex algorithmic sections.
Report generated by Daily Code Metrics workflow
Historical data: 7 entries | Last updated: 2026-02-01 17:20 UTC
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions