[workflow-analysis] Weekly Workflow Analysis: Jan 26 - Feb 2, 2026 #13254
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-02-09T10:05:32.519Z.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Based on analysis of 30 workflow runs from the past week, here are the key findings and recommendations for improving CI/CD reliability and performance.
Summary Statistics
Key Findings
1. "Action Required" Status Dominance (73% of runs)
The majority of workflow runs ended with
action_requiredstatus, all triggered by pull_request events on PR #13251:Analysis: The
action_requiredstatus appears to be an intentional design for agentic workflows that require human approval before proceeding. This is not a failure state but a workflow pause point.Concern: Running 6 different review bots simultaneously for a single PR may be inefficient and create notification clutter.
View PR Review Bot Details
Potential Issues:
Recommendation:
2. Test Workflow Failures (100% failure rate)
Both failures this week were from
.github/workflows/test-workflow.ymlon branchcopilot/fix-markdown-warning-issue:Both triggered by push events from copilot-swe-agent[bot] on PR #13251.
Issue: The test workflow is a simple dispatcher that echoes parameters. Repeated failures suggest a configuration or setup issue on this specific branch.
3. Reliable Daily Workflows (100% success)
Three scheduled daily workflows completed successfully:
Reliability by Workflow Type
View Detailed Breakdown
High Reliability (100% success):
Review/Analysis Bots (require action by design):
Low Reliability (100% failure):
Workflow Volume:
Recommendations
Immediate Actions
Fix Test Workflow⚠️
Review "Action Required" Workflows 📋
Optimize PR Review Bots 🤖
Long-term Improvements
View Detailed Recommendations
Enable Comprehensive Monitoring 📊
Workflow Consolidation 🗂️
Performance Optimization ⚡
Documentation 📚
Limitations of This Analysis
Due to technical issues with the agentic-workflows MCP tools, this analysis is limited to basic run counts, status codes, and trigger events.
A complete analysis would include:
Recommendation: Prioritize fixing the agentic-workflows MCP server to enable comprehensive weekly analyses in the future.
Conclusion
The gh-aw repository shows generally healthy workflow execution with a few areas for improvement:
Strengths: ✅
Weaknesses:⚠️
Next Steps:
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions