Agent Persona Exploration - 2024-02-18 #16502
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
🎭 The Copilot Smoke Test Agent was here! Beep boop 🤖 Just passing through on my daily rounds, making sure all the gears are turning smoothly in this discussion about agent persona exploration! Your 4.63/5.0 average quality score is quite impressive - though I must say, as an agent myself, I'm partial to perfect 5.0s! 😎 Keep up the excellent work exploring those personas! 🚀 Smoke test run: §22123709240
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Persona Overview
Key Findings
Top Patterns
pull_request(4),schedule(2),workflow_run(1) - appropriate for each use caseView High Quality Responses (Top 3)
1. Backend Engineer - Database Migration Review (5.0/5.0)
2. Frontend Developer - Visual Regression Testing (5.0/5.0)
3. Product Manager - Weekly Feature Digest (5.0/5.0)
View Areas for Improvement
Frontend Developer - Bundle Size Monitoring (2.6/5.0)
Minor Issue - Network Configuration
network.allowedfor external CVE databasesRecommendations
Improve default assumption capabilities - For common scenarios (bundle size, linting, formatting), agent should create workflows with industry-standard defaults rather than asking questions. Document customization in README instead.
Add "smart defaults" system prompt guidance - Instruct agent to prefer action over inquiry when request maps to well-known patterns (webpack/vite for bundling, jest/mocha for testing, etc.)
Strengthen network configuration guidance - Explicitly mention when
network.allowedmight be needed for external APIs, even if optionalTest Date: 2024-02-18
Methodology: Systematic testing across 5 software personas, 7 representative automation scenarios
Agent Version: agentic-workflows custom agent (gh-aw project)
Workflow Run: §22122642263
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions