You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Safe Output Jobs Failed: 1 (actually a post-processing failure)
Actual Safe Output Success Rate: 96.97% (32/33, excluding skipped jobs)
Overall Success Rate: 87.88% (29/33, including skipped)
Key Finding
The single "failure" recorded is not a safe output job failure. The Duplicate Code Detector workflow successfully created an issue, but a subsequent step to assign Copilot to the issue failed due to insufficient GitHub token permissions. This is a post-processing failure, not a safe output failure.
Health Status: ✅ EXCELLENT
Safe output jobs are performing exceptionally well with only 1 post-processing permission issue and 3 skipped jobs out of 33 total executions.
Safe Output Job Statistics
Job Type
Total Executions
Failures
Skipped
Success Rate
safe_outputs
33
1*
3
87.88%
*The 1 failure is actually a post-processing step, not the safe output job itself. True safe output success rate: 96.97% (32/33 excluding skipped).
Execution Duration
Average Duration: 16.0 seconds
Range: 7-44 seconds
Fastest Workflows: Auto-Triage Issues (7s), Agent Container Smoke Test (8s)
✅ Issue content was correct: Title, body, labels all populated correctly
❌ Post-processing step failed: Attempted to assign Copilot to the newly created issue
❌ Permission denied: GraphQL mutation replaceActorsForAssignable returned FORBIDDEN
Error Details
View GraphQL error
{
"errors": [
{
"type": "FORBIDDEN",
"path": ["replaceActorsForAssignable"],
"message": "Could not assign agent: target repository is not writable."
}
]
}
Root Cause: The GITHUB_TOKEN used by the workflow has contents: read and issues: write permissions, but lacks the additional permissions required to assign Copilot agents to issues via the GraphQL API.
Impact
Safe Output Health: ✅ No impact - safe output job worked correctly
User Experience: ⚠️ Minor - Issue was created but Copilot wasn't auto-assigned
Problem: Workflow attempts to assign Copilot but lacks required permissions.
Options:
Option A: Add Required Permissions (Recommended)
Research the exact permission required for replaceActorsForAssignable
Add to workflow's permissions: block
Verify in a test run
Option B: Make Assignment Optional
Wrap assignment step in try-catch
Continue workflow even if assignment fails
Log warning instead of error
Option C: Remove Assignment Step
Remove the Copilot assignment entirely
Users can manually assign if needed
Recommendation: Option B (make optional) - preserves functionality where possible without blocking workflow success.
Estimated Effort: Small (1-2 hours)
3. Improve Error Messages [Priority: Low]
Problem: Permission errors in post-processing steps cause confusing failure states.
Recommendation:
Add clear error messages explaining what succeeded and what failed
Include workarounds in error output (e.g., "Issue created successfully at #X, but automatic Copilot assignment failed. Please assign manually.")
Use workflow status annotations to show partial success
Estimated Effort: Small (2-3 hours)
Historical Context
This is the first safe output health audit, so no historical data is available for trend analysis. Future audits will track:
Success rate trends over time
Error pattern evolution
Performance degradation signals
Workflow reliability changes
Metrics and KPIs
Overall Safe Output Success Rate
Actual (excluding post-processing): 96.97% ✅
Reported (including post-processing): 87.88% ⚠️
Most Reliable Workflows (5+ executions)
AI Moderator: 6/6 successful (100%)
Auto-Triage Issues: 5/5 successful (100%)
Average Performance
Execution Time: 16.0 seconds (excellent)
Failure Rate: 3.03% (1/33, excellent)
Skip Rate: 9.09% (3/33, expected for conditional workflows)
Job Type Distribution
create_issue: Most common safe output type
add_comment: Frequently used for triage workflows
create_discussion: Used in reporting workflows
noop: Used when no action needed (transparency logs)
Next Steps
Update monitoring to distinguish safe output vs. post-processing failures
Investigate exact permission needed for Copilot assignment
Implement error handling for optional post-processing steps
Schedule next audit for February 19, 2026
Build trending dashboard with historical data
Conclusion
Safe output job health is excellent. The system is performing reliably with a 96.97% true success rate. The single "failure" is actually a post-processing permission issue that occurred after successful issue creation.
Key Takeaways
✅ Safe output processing is working correctly
✅ No bugs or systematic failures detected
⚠️ Post-processing steps need better error handling
⚠️ Monitoring needs to separate safe output health from post-processing health
✅ Average execution time (16s) is fast and consistent
References:
§22125968544 - Duplicate Code Detector with post-processing failure
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Key Finding
The single "failure" recorded is not a safe output job failure. The Duplicate Code Detector workflow successfully created an issue, but a subsequent step to assign Copilot to the issue failed due to insufficient GitHub token permissions. This is a post-processing failure, not a safe output failure.
Health Status: ✅ EXCELLENT
Safe output jobs are performing exceptionally well with only 1 post-processing permission issue and 3 skipped jobs out of 33 total executions.
Safe Output Job Statistics
*The 1 failure is actually a post-processing step, not the safe output job itself. True safe output success rate: 96.97% (32/33 excluding skipped).
Execution Duration
Workflow Performance Breakdown
Top Performers (100% Success Rate)
View 16 workflows with perfect success
Workflows with Post-Processing Issues
Workflows with Skipped Jobs
Error Analysis
Single "Failure" - Post-Processing Permission Error
Run: §22125968544
Workflow: Duplicate Code Detector
Job: Step 7 - "Assign Copilot to created issues" (post-safe-output)
What Happened
replaceActorsForAssignablereturned FORBIDDENError Details
View GraphQL error
{ "errors": [ { "type": "FORBIDDEN", "path": ["replaceActorsForAssignable"], "message": "Could not assign agent: target repository is not writable." } ] }Root Cause: The GITHUB_TOKEN used by the workflow has
contents: readandissues: writepermissions, but lacks the additional permissions required to assign Copilot agents to issues via the GraphQL API.Impact
Root Cause Analysis
Classification: Post-Processing Failure
This is NOT a safe output job failure. The safe output system performed correctly:
create_issueinstructionThe failure occurred in a subsequent workflow step that attempted to enhance the created issue by assigning Copilot.
Why This Matters for Monitoring
This distinction is critical for accurate health monitoring:
Token Permission Analysis
Current
GITHUB_TOKENpermissions:contents: read- Can read repository filesissues: write- Can create, edit, comment on issuesreplaceActorsForAssignableRecommendations
1. Differentiate Safe Output from Post-Processing [Priority: Medium]
Problem: Current monitoring conflates safe output job health with post-processing step health.
Recommendation: Update monitoring dashboards and alerts to distinguish:
Implementation:
Estimated Effort: Small (2-4 hours)
2. Fix Copilot Assignment Permission [Priority: Low]
Problem: Workflow attempts to assign Copilot but lacks required permissions.
Options:
Option A: Add Required Permissions (Recommended)
replaceActorsForAssignablepermissions:blockOption B: Make Assignment Optional
Option C: Remove Assignment Step
Recommendation: Option B (make optional) - preserves functionality where possible without blocking workflow success.
Estimated Effort: Small (1-2 hours)
3. Improve Error Messages [Priority: Low]
Problem: Permission errors in post-processing steps cause confusing failure states.
Recommendation:
Estimated Effort: Small (2-3 hours)
Historical Context
This is the first safe output health audit, so no historical data is available for trend analysis. Future audits will track:
Metrics and KPIs
Overall Safe Output Success Rate
Most Reliable Workflows (5+ executions)
Average Performance
Job Type Distribution
Next Steps
Conclusion
Safe output job health is excellent. The system is performing reliably with a 96.97% true success rate. The single "failure" is actually a post-processing permission issue that occurred after successful issue creation.
Key Takeaways
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions