🔍 Static Analysis Report - December 11, 2024 #6117
Closed
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
/plan |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 3 days ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Comprehensive static analysis completed on all agentic workflow files using zizmor, poutine, and actionlint.
🎉 Excellent news: All 109 workflows are highly secure with only one minor code quality issue found.
Key Findings
Tools Used
*Poutine requires GitHub API token for repository analysis and could not run in the current environment.
Analysis Summary
Findings by Severity
Findings by Tool
Zizmor (Security Scanner)
Poutine (Supply Chain Security)
Actionlint (Linting & Best Practices)
(details)
(summary)Detailed Findings(/summary)
Actionlint Findings
Finding #1: Shellcheck SC2162 - read without -r flag
Workflow:
ci-coach.lock.ymlLocation: Line 978, Column 9
Severity: Info
Rule: SC2162
Issue Description:
The workflow uses a
readcommand without the-rflag in a while loop. Without-r, backslashes in the input will be interpreted as escape characters, which can lead to unexpected behavior.Current Code:
Recommended Fix:
Impact:
Reference: ShellCheck SC2162
(/details)
Fix Suggestion for SC2162
Since this is the only finding and it's very minor (info severity), here's a quick fix prompt for a Copilot agent:
Prompt to Copilot Agent
Fix: Add
-rflag to the read command:Why: The
-rflag prevents backslash interpretation, ensuring input fromjqis read exactly as output. This is a shellcheck best practice.After making the change, recompile the workflow with:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions