-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
Description
Description
The User Experience Analysis Report (Discussion #13799) identified a documentation gap in docs/src/content/docs/reference/permissions.md:
- Technical details are comprehensive
- Missing "Why This Model?" section explaining security rationale
- Enterprise users need to understand business value for security discussions
Problem
The permissions documentation jumps directly into technical implementation without establishing:
- Why the read-only model exists
- Security benefits for enterprise environments
- How to communicate value to security/compliance teams
This creates barriers when developers need to justify the architecture to stakeholders.
Suggested Changes
Add a new section after line 29 (after "This model prevents AI agents from accidentally or maliciously modifying repository content during execution."):
### Why This Model?
In enterprise environments, AI agents require careful security controls:
- **Audit Trail**: Separating read (agent) from write (safe outputs) provides clear accountability for all changes
- **Blast Radius Containment**: If an agent misbehaves, it cannot modify code, merge PRs, or delete resources
- **Compliance**: Many organizations require approval workflows for automated changes - safe outputs provide the approval gate
- **Defense in Depth**: Even if prompt injection occurs, the agent cannot perform destructive actions
This model trades convenience for enterprise-grade security. Safe outputs add one extra job but provide critical safety guarantees.Files Affected
docs/src/content/docs/reference/permissions.md(single file change)
Success Criteria
- New "Why This Model?" section added between lines 29-32
- Content includes 4-6 bullet points covering security rationale
- Professional tone appropriate for enterprise audience
- Documentation quality rating improves from
⚠️ to ✅ - No other files modified
Source
Extracted from User Experience Analysis Report - 2026-02-04
Priority
Medium - Improves enterprise adoption by helping developers communicate security value to compliance teams. High impact for new users evaluating the system.
AI generated by Discussion Task Miner - Code Quality Improvement Agent
- expires on Feb 6, 2026, 5:24 AM UTC