📚 Documentation Noob Test Report - January 22, 2026 #11228
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-01-29T07:51:07.856Z. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Test method: Automated HTML content analysis
Pages analyzed: 6 key pages (homepage, quick start, CLI commands, creating workflows, examples)
Overall impression: Good structure and comprehensive content, but assumes too much prior knowledge
🔴 Critical Issues
1. Jargon Without Definitions
"Frontmatter" appears 8 times in Quick Start but is never explained. New users don't know this refers to the YAML header in markdown files.
"MCP" appears 7 times but the acronym is never expanded to "Model Context Protocol".
Impact: High - Beginners will be confused from the start
Fix: Add a "Key Concepts" section defining frontmatter, MCP, workflow lifecycle, and lock files. Link from first mentions.
2. Installation Prerequisites Buried
Prerequisites section exists but doesn't emphasize:
Fix: Add prominent callout box at Quick Start top listing ALL requirements upfront.
🟡 Confusing Areas
1. Compilation Purpose Not Explained
Quick Start shows
gh aw compilebut doesn't explain WHY. Users don't understand why.mdbecomes.lock.yml.Fix: Explain upfront: "Workflows are written in markdown but GitHub Actions needs YAML"
2. CLI Page Overwhelming (107 commands!)
Fix: Split into Essential/Common/Advanced sections or add beginner/intermediate/advanced tabs
3. Examples Lack Complete Context
Fix: Every example should show:
.github/workflows/my-workflow.md)4. "Agentic" Never Defined
The core term "agentic" is used everywhere but never explained.
Fix: First mention should define: "Agentic workflows are AI-powered automations that can make decisions and take actions autonomously"
🟢 What Worked Well
✅ Homepage immediately explains the tool with clear CTA
✅ Quick Start has excellent structure with 26 code examples
✅ CLI docs are comprehensive with 79 code examples
✅ Good visual hierarchy and consistent formatting
✅ No broken internal links detected
📊 Recommendations (Prioritized)
High Priority (Quick Wins - 1-4 hours total)
Medium Priority (4-8 hours)
Lower Priority (1-2 weeks)
🔧 Technical Findings
Documentation Build
Content Structure
📝 Conclusion
The documentation has a solid foundation with comprehensive content. Main issues:
These are highly fixable in 1-2 days of focused work.
Overall grade: B (Good content, needs better onboarding)
🎯 Success Metrics
Track with actual beginners:
Note: Playwright browser automation encountered connectivity issues, so analysis was performed via HTML parsing. Screenshots were not captured but findings are based on thorough content structure analysis.
Generated by: Documentation Noob Test - Automated Analysis
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions