You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Safe Output Job: Skipped (no safe output operations required)
Notes: Workflow completed successfully without needing safe output processing
Error Analysis
No errors detected in the analyzed safe output job executions.
Historical Context
Comparison with Previous Audit (January 29, 2026)
Metric
Jan 29
Jan 30
Trend
Runs Analyzed
10
2
⚠️ Decreased
Safe Output Jobs Executed
8
1
⚠️ Decreased
Success Rate
100%
100%
✅ Stable
Error Clusters
2
0
✅ Improved
Warnings
30
0
✅ Improved
Previously Identified Issues (Jan 29)
Two error clusters were identified yesterday but not observed in today's limited sample:
Campaign Label Permission Error (Medium severity)
Pattern: "Failed to add campaign label: Resource not accessible by personal access token"
Affected: update_project operations in Dependabot Burner workflow
Status: Not observed today (no update_project operations in sample)
Field Type Mismatch (Medium severity)
Pattern: Field type mismatch for "target_repo"/"worker_workflow" (Expected SINGLE_SELECT but found TEXT)
Affected: update_project operations in Dependabot Burner workflow
Status: Not observed today (no update_project operations in sample)
Data Quality Assessment
⚠️Limited Sample Size: Today's audit analyzed only 2 workflow runs compared to 10 runs in the previous audit. This provides limited visibility into the overall health of safe output jobs.
Sample Coverage:
Total runs available: 2
Time window: Last 24 hours
Data quality: Limited
Confidence level: Low
Recommendation: Re-run audit during peak activity hours or expand log collection scope
Field type mismatches - GitHub Projects field configuration issues
API rate limits - Occasional during high-volume operations
Network timeouts - Rare, usually self-recovering
Metrics and KPIs
Overall Safe Output Success Rate: 100%
Most Reliable Job Type: noop (100% - 1/1 successful)
Most Problematic Job Type: None (no failures observed)
Average Execution Time: 8 seconds (noop job)
Error Recovery Rate: N/A (no errors to recover from)
Next Steps
✅ Continue daily monitoring
⚠️ Expand log collection for more comprehensive analysis
✅ Verify resolution of previous permission and field type issues
✅ Monitor for recurrence of yesterday's error patterns
Conclusion
Today's audit shows excellent safe output job health with a 100% success rate for all executed jobs. However, the limited sample size (2 runs vs 10 yesterday) reduces confidence in the overall assessment. The absence of previously identified error patterns may indicate resolution or simply reflect the lack of relevant workflow runs in today's sample.
Recommended Action: Re-run audit during a period of higher workflow activity or expand log collection parameters to capture more runs.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Audit Period: January 30, 2026 (Last 24 hours)
Key Metrics:
Status: All executed safe output jobs completed successfully with no errors detected.
Safe Output Job Statistics
Workflow Runs Analyzed
Run 1: Security Guard Agent 🛡️
Run 2: Issue Monster
Error Analysis
No errors detected in the analyzed safe output job executions.
Historical Context
Comparison with Previous Audit (January 29, 2026)
Previously Identified Issues (Jan 29)
Two error clusters were identified yesterday but not observed in today's limited sample:
Campaign Label Permission Error (Medium severity)
Field Type Mismatch (Medium severity)
Data Quality Assessment
Sample Coverage:
Recommendations
1. Monitoring Enhancement (Low Priority)
Issue: Limited sample size reduces audit effectiveness
Root Cause: Only 2 workflow runs were captured in the log collection for the 24-hour period, significantly less than the 10 runs captured yesterday.
Recommended Actions:
Impact: Improves audit comprehensiveness and trend detection accuracy
2. Monitor Previous Error Patterns (Medium Priority)
Issue: Two error patterns identified yesterday were not observed today, but this may be due to limited sample size rather than resolution
Recommended Actions:
Impact: Ensures persistent issues don't go unresolved
Historical Trends
Based on cache memory analysis spanning multiple months:
Overall Safe Output Job Health: Excellent
Common Error Patterns (from historical data):
Metrics and KPIs
Next Steps
Conclusion
Today's audit shows excellent safe output job health with a 100% success rate for all executed jobs. However, the limited sample size (2 runs vs 10 yesterday) reduces confidence in the overall assessment. The absence of previously identified error patterns may indicate resolution or simply reflect the lack of relevant workflow runs in today's sample.
Recommended Action: Re-run audit during a period of higher workflow activity or expand log collection parameters to capture more runs.
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions