📚 Documentation Noob Test Report - December 15, 2025 #6502
Closed
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
/plan |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it was created by an agentic workflow more than 3 days ago. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Date of test: December 15, 2025
Pages analyzed:
/gh-aw/)/gh-aw/setup/quick-start/)/gh-aw/setup/cli/)Overall impression as a new user:
The documentation has a professional structure with good visual design, but contains several critical gaps and confusing areas that would significantly slow down a complete beginner trying to get started with GitHub Agentic Workflows.
🔴 Critical Issues Found
1. Missing "What is this?" on Homepage
Issue: The homepage jumps straight into "What are Agentic Workflows?" without first establishing what GitHub Agentic Workflows (the tool/extension) actually is.
Impact: As a newcomer, I'm confused about whether this is:
Recommendation: Add a prominent section at the very top:
## What is GitHub Agentic Workflows? GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) is a GitHub CLI extension that lets you write AI-powered automation workflows in plain English using markdown files. These workflows run on GitHub Actions and can make intelligent decisions about your repository.2. Unclear Installation Prerequisites
Issue: The Quick Start guide says "Install the extension" but doesn't clearly state what prerequisites you need BEFORE you can even install it.
What a beginner doesn't know:
Current text:
Should be:
3. Token Creation Instructions Too Buried
Issue: Step 3 of Quick Start requires creating a Personal Access Token with a very specific "Copilot Requests" permission. This is CRITICAL but feels buried in a long list of sub-steps.
Why this is confusing:
Recommendation: Add prominent explanation at the start:
4. "What happens next?" Missing After Token Setup
Issue: After I add the
COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKENsecret, the guide says "✅ Your repository is now configured!" but doesn't tell me:Missing verification step:
🟡 Confusing Areas
1. "Agentic" Jargon Without Definition
Issue: The term "agentic" appears everywhere but is never explicitly defined in simple terms.
Current explanation:
Problem: Uses the word to define itself. A beginner doesn't know what "agency" means in this context.
Better explanation:
2. Frontmatter Term Used Without Introduction
Issue: Quick Start section "Understanding Your First Workflow" mentions "Frontmatter (between
---markers)" but assumes you know what frontmatter is.For a noob: I might think:
Quick fix: Add a tooltip or footnote:
3. YAML Knowledge Assumed
Issue: The workflow examples show YAML configuration but never mention "this is YAML" or link to YAML documentation.
Problem: A beginner might think:
- itemandkey: value?Recommendation: Add a "YAML Basics" callout box in Quick Start:
4. "Safe Outputs" Concept Unclear
Issue: The explanation says:
Why this is confusing:
Better explanation:
5. CLI Command Examples Could Be More Beginner-Friendly
Issue: CLI Commands page shows a lot of commands without explaining when a beginner would actually use each one.
Example: The command reference shows:
Missing context:
Recommendation: Add a "Common Workflows" section:
When something goes wrong:
6. Example Workflow Too Complex for "First Workflow"
Issue: The "daily team status" workflow used in Quick Start includes:
For a beginner: This is overwhelming. I don't understand half of these settings.
Recommendation: Start with a simpler "Hello World" example:
Then show the more complex daily team status example.
🟢 What Worked Well
1. Visual Hierarchy is Clear
The documentation uses headings, code blocks, and callouts effectively. Easy to scan and find sections.
2. Step Numbers in Quick Start
The numbered steps (Step 1, Step 2, etc.) make it clear this is a sequential process.
3. Code Examples Are Copy-Pasteable
All bash commands and YAML examples are in proper code blocks with syntax highlighting.
4. "RESEARCH PROTOTYPE" Badge
The prominent warning on the homepage sets appropriate expectations that this is experimental.
5. Links to Related Documentation
Each page includes "Related Documentation" links at the bottom, helping with navigation.
📋 Recommendations
Quick Wins (high impact, low effort)
Medium-Term Improvements
Longer-Term Enhancements
🎯 Priority Focus Areas
If you can only fix 3 things this week:
These three changes would dramatically improve the new user experience.
📊 Testing Methodology
This report was generated by:
Labels: documentation, user-experience, automated-testing
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions