-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RDF schemas #20
Labels
Comments
I certainly have no objection to this, as long as we ensure that the documentation is also written for this format. |
Good, we must decide the structure of the documentation to specific what all formats must provide. |
Closed
I think this closed by the release of v1.1. @arademaker can you confirm (by closing this issue) or expand on what we still need? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Can we have more than one RDF schema? The schema adopted by http://openwordnet-pt.org precedes the W3C OntoLex Model being based on https://www.w3.org/TR/wordnet-rdf/. We have the schema specification and we are also developing a https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/ validation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: