Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible Internalize regression #357

Closed
Aragas opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Possible Internalize regression #357

Aragas opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Aragas
Copy link

Aragas commented Apr 3, 2024

Good day!
It seems that there's a regression in v2.0.29 with internalize. Simply setting the --internalize flag triggers an error "Input file not found: --internalize"
Based on the recent commits, I believe the idea was to add an optional list of files with the flags, but it might not work now when no files are provided at all

@KirillOsenkov KirillOsenkov self-assigned this Apr 3, 2024
@mattleibow
Copy link

Not sure if this is related, but the Mono.Cecil types are no longer internal/hidden. They are now conflicting with my Mono.Cecil package reference.

@mattleibow
Copy link

Seems they are public from 2.0.24. At least that is the version I tested. 2.0.18 was still internal.

@KirillOsenkov
Copy link
Collaborator

OK will look into internalizing Cecil, sorry about all the regressions

@KirillOsenkov
Copy link
Collaborator

Filed #358 to track it separately

@KirillOsenkov
Copy link
Collaborator

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants