Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use [positive] for unification variables (and regular variables?) #48

Open
gmalecha opened this issue Oct 1, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Use [positive] for unification variables (and regular variables?) #48

gmalecha opened this issue Oct 1, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@gmalecha
Copy link
Owner

gmalecha commented Oct 1, 2014

No description provided.

@gmalecha
Copy link
Owner Author

gmalecha commented Oct 1, 2014

This requires an equivalent of [hlist] for positive maps.

@gmalecha
Copy link
Owner Author

gmalecha commented Nov 9, 2014

A simpler alternative is to make the denotation function convert back to nats. This would still be a win because (for the most part) most unification variables are transient.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@gmalecha