Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest to shorten the time of stale #10892

Closed
7 tasks
a1012112796 opened this issue Mar 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
7 tasks

Suggest to shorten the time of stale #10892

a1012112796 opened this issue Mar 30, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.

Comments

@a1012112796
Copy link
Member

  • Gitea version (or commit ref):
  • Git version:
  • Operating system:
  • Database (use [x]):
    • PostgreSQL
    • MySQL
    • MSSQL
    • SQLite
  • Can you reproduce the bug at https://try.gitea.io:
    • Yes (provide example URL)
    • No
    • Not relevant
  • Log gist:

Description

Hello, now the stale time is two month. I think it would be more usefull to cut it down to one month or even twenty days. because I think the stale is a way to notify users to take care of the issue or pull request which hase been lost focus. but I think two moths is too long to do this thing. the reason why I think about this thing is this PR (#10492) . It haven't be reviewed from 27 Feb to four days before. The author may be have lost interest about it . thats my thinks , thanks .

@lunny lunny added the type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. label Mar 31, 2020
@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Apr 6, 2020

stale is sometime anoying but it remid you, so 👍

@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants