-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The table column content
/patch
in issue
/comment
should be longtext
#16656
Comments
issue
.content
should be longtext
issue
.content
should be longtext
issue
.content
should be longtext
content
/patch
in issue
/comment
should be longtext
/cc @lunny |
|
Actually there are many issues in GitHub/GitLab have very long content, eg: issues with detail logs. And we can easily find large content issue in gitea's issue list, eg: IMO there is no necessary to limit content size. ps: Bill Gates said that "640KB is enough for everyone" 😂 If gitea must have the 64KB limit, it's better to tell users who are migrating repositories the detailed failure reason and which issue causes the failure. Otherwise end users have no knowledge how to deal this the unclear error message and can never complete the migration. |
I proposed a PR: #16765 When using I think is good to eliminate the limitation across databases. |
implemented in #16765 |
[x]
):Description
When migrating issues with long content, gitea may report error:
Bypass Fix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: