Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we support reverse engineering? #25

Open
dudadornelles opened this issue Jul 2, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Should we support reverse engineering? #25

dudadornelles opened this issue Jul 2, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@dudadornelles
Copy link
Contributor

Just want to hear the ideas out there;

There is a lot of effort that went into supporting reverse engineering of pipelines and to keep supporting it we need to be a lot more thorough reviewing PRs and spend time testing and making sure that all new things are reversible. At the same time, we have a lot to catch up: config repos, auth plugins, roles.

Is reverse engineering a feature we want to keep in gomatic? Is the effort on maintaining it compatible with the value it brings?

@dudadornelles dudadornelles changed the title Should we still support reverse engineering? Should we support reverse engineering? Jul 2, 2017
@alanjds
Copy link

alanjds commented Jul 5, 2017

Just to say, I starred this repo instead of similar ones because of the reverse engineering.

@gkirchner
Copy link

Yes please, stay with reverse engineering! It is a very valuable feature to our project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants