You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For major headers in the Godot docs, there is a convenient "¶" link that appears if you hover over it, which can be used to refer others to that exact header in the documentation. This is helpful when assisting others with understanding Godot.
The lack of "¶" links for function names makes it harder to link users to ones which may be relevant to them in the help forums. Since these methods already have unique IDs, all that's needed is to actually add a link to them.
I propose that "¶" links be added for function name headers just like they are for higher-level headers.
URL to the documentation page (if already existing):
(see above)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Your Godot version:
(not relevant to issue)
Issue description:
For major headers in the Godot docs, there is a convenient "¶" link that appears if you hover over it, which can be used to refer others to that exact header in the documentation. This is helpful when assisting others with understanding Godot.
For example, on the AnimatedSprite2D page, you'll see this on the "Method Descriptions" header. I can directly link to it like this, AND right click the ¶ to copy this link.
https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/classes/class_animatedsprite2d.html#method-descriptions
However, such behavior does not exist for the function headers such as
get_playing_speed()
in the screenshot above. They do have unique IDs in the HTML, so I can link directly them, but I have to actually dig into the HTML itself to acquire the ID string and then make a full url for it. There is no "¶" link that I can simply copy for the functions:https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/classes/class_animatedsprite2d.html#class-animatedsprite2d-method-set-frame-and-progress
The lack of "¶" links for function names makes it harder to link users to ones which may be relevant to them in the help forums. Since these methods already have unique IDs, all that's needed is to actually add a link to them.
I propose that "¶" links be added for function name headers just like they are for higher-level headers.
URL to the documentation page (if already existing):
(see above)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: