Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migration path to one-true source is unknown #16

Closed
dhermes opened this issue Apr 9, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Migration path to one-true source is unknown #16

dhermes opened this issue Apr 9, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor

dhermes commented Apr 9, 2015

There are copies floating here, in https://github.com/craigcitro/apitools, "internal" in Google, in gsutil and possible elsewhere.

Is there a migration plan in place? Is there a known set of features that differ? Is there a TODO list?


Most importantly: Can we (open source peoplez) help?

@craigcitro
Copy link
Contributor

actually, this is now the one true copy of the source:

  • craigcitro/apitools is a fork,
  • internal is a mirror of this code,
  • gsutil uses this repo as a submodule, and
  • there are no other forks I created.

there are still some additional internal bits that add internal-only functionality, and a bunch of integration tests. but for the source itself, this is the truth.

as to helping: once i get some cycles, i'm planning to push the integration tests into this repo, and i'll need to set up travis to run them. i totally want to copy the gcloud-python setup for that.

@dhermes
Copy link
Contributor Author

dhermes commented Apr 10, 2015

w00t

So I'd say "close this", though I believe you've mentioned elsewhere that you are missing tests here that you run elsewhere.

Maybe close this and file a bug for that? Or just rename here?

@craigcitro
Copy link
Contributor

i opened #17 for the tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants