-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mutator regressions #4448
Comments
With regard to not bumping, this was done on purpose to avoid #4175 While not bumping in the case you've documented may be a bad behavior, I don't think it should considered a regression because bumping wasn't happening until #3468 introduced it. I do think not bumping is a problem, but I personally have no idea to fix it without digging up other issues. |
Mutators used to bump: |
Ok I stand corrected! So we need Put up a reversion to the bad PR here. Thank you for correcting me and providing the permanent snap shot :D That really helped me track down the issue! |
There are two separate regressions in mutators. Here's a video:
https://youtu.be/kg68406XE5c
First issue is that if there are several items in the stack, and n are dragged away, during the drag n-1 inputs are removed from the mutated block. Presumably this is the insertion marker leaking.
The second issue is that if a new item in the stack is added, and a new input appears on the mutated block, there isn't a bump for a non-connected block. This leads to a visual syntax error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: