Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Windows] Clang doesn't give us debug info #48

Closed
ramosian-glider opened this issue Aug 31, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

[Windows] Clang doesn't give us debug info #48

ramosian-glider opened this issue Aug 31, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@ramosian-glider
Copy link
Member

Originally reported on Google Code with ID 48

See upstream bug http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12283

Reported by timurrrr on 2012-03-16 13:12:39

@ramosian-glider
Copy link
Member Author

In fact this should not bother you, if Clang emits at least DWARF on Windows.
Once we teach ASan to parse the debug info, it'll be capable to symbolize stacks without
dbghelp.

Reported by ramosian.glider on 2012-03-16 15:35:07

@ramosian-glider
Copy link
Member Author

The question is, how well DWARF in PE is supported in llvm, lldb and other tools. If
at all.

Reported by eugenis@google.com on 2012-03-16 15:44:33

@ramosian-glider
Copy link
Member Author

Reported by konstantin.s.serebryany on 2012-03-16 16:40:12

@ramosian-glider
Copy link
Member Author

Reported by konstantin.s.serebryany on 2012-03-16 16:40:56

@ramosian-glider
Copy link
Member Author

Reported by timurrrr on 2012-03-16 18:39:27

  • Status changed: ExternalDependency

@ramosian-glider
Copy link
Member Author

Clang gives us just enough DI since Feb 2014

Reported by timurrrr@google.com on 2014-05-07 08:57:41

  • Status changed: Verified

@ramosian-glider
Copy link
Member Author

Adding Project:AddressSanitizer as part of GitHub migration.

Reported by ramosian.glider on 2015-07-30 09:12:58

  • Labels added: ProjectAddressSanitizer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant