Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: handle wkt in paged requests #1132

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

noahdietz
Copy link
Collaborator

@noahdietz noahdietz commented Sep 13, 2022

For Standard List methods, and most other paginated methods, having fields in the request message outside of a resource name and the standard fields is non-compliant. However, there is at least one API that utilizes such non-standard fields, one of them being a well-known type that would end up being encoded in the query params. So that case needs to be supported.

@noahdietz noahdietz requested review from a team as code owners September 13, 2022 18:55
@noahdietz noahdietz added the automerge Summon MOG for automerging label Sep 13, 2022
@noahdietz noahdietz added automerge Summon MOG for automerging and removed automerge Summon MOG for automerging labels Sep 13, 2022
Copy link
Member

@codyoss codyoss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@noahdietz noahdietz merged commit 0c23c8d into googleapis:main Sep 13, 2022
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Summon MOG for automerging label Sep 13, 2022
@noahdietz noahdietz deleted the fix-wkt-errors branch September 13, 2022 19:35
gcf-merge-on-green bot pushed a commit to googleapis/google-cloud-go that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2022
Includes fix for well-known types in query parameters of Paginated methods for REGAPICs googleapis/gapic-generator-go#1132
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants