-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 380
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: do not use #private #1454
fix: do not use #private #1454
Conversation
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [8.5.1](v8.5.0...v8.5.1) (2022-08-31) ### Bug Fixes * do not use #private ([#1454](#1454)) ([6c30274](6c30274)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Oh that's interesting, private class fields have been on Node.js since v12. I believe this is more of a matter of reconfiguring our TypeScript compiler to a little more modern level of ECMAScript support rather than being an unsupported feature. That said, there's maybe an argument to be made on what is the more JS-idiommatic way of expressing the intent of a private method/property vs TS-idiommatic and I'm not sure where the collective consensus within the larger JavaScript ecosystem sits on that. Anyways just wanted to highlight that it might be possible to support |
@ruyadorno no problem, we just need to update gts & TypeScript in https://github.com/google/pack-n-play (the repo needs some love). |
a year after, this issue bothers me. 134 #private; Found 1 error.` |
@DesAWSume the error message explains what to do; simply target es2015+ in TypeScript: |
Oh~. 2nd look. I have a tsconfig under src folder, which my yarn build command will target to it. |
Adding a
#
private method is technically a breaking change. Our packing tests across all client libraries are now failing with(in CI, this looks like a
pack-n-play
TypeScript test failure as a part of system tests)Let's not be that modern and use the regular private method instead.